Quote Originally Posted by Bx730NY
Quote Originally Posted by Majesty
Quote Originally Posted by landmine950
There was a LOT of illegal stuff by Peter
He got warned a PILE of times
Hitting behind the head,holding,posting a lot of stuff
The ref kept warning him and stopped the fight twice to warn him.
He held toney's hed down and then clubbed him like 3 times right on the brain stem. That was intentional and should have garnered a point deduction.
But! he didn't blatently do it again right away,giving the ref the chance to deduct a point.
Also if you bend way over and lean off to the right when your only 5 foot nothin to start with..guess what! your going to get hit in the back of the mellon! Its not a legitimate defense! Its like turning your back at the last second and complaining. im not sure of the ruling in Pro but in Amatuer its strictly illegal to bend over. Don't forget the fight where Briggs turned a guy around held his head over the ropes and then nailed him with a right hand! he KO's the guy and wins the fight with a TOTTALLY illegal blow. Moral or the story if you get away with it its legal!
There's a difference between swinging and missing your punch and hitting someone in the back of the head, and AIMIMG for it and hammering down on it.

You know a fighter can get a concussion because of that, ask Montell Griffin what happened when he fought Tarver.

Anyway, I didn't think Peter dominated Toney in any way shape or form and my dad thought Toney won the fight.

So I guess its what you're looking for in the fight really.

I was impressed with Peters jab, wasn't impress at how he's still open for every punch Toney threw
OK.............. so you didn't think Peter dominated him and your dad thought Toney won. I guess it's true what they say, bad eyesight is hereditary.
Yo dont diss my father.