
Originally Posted by
Kel
Ok let's stop picking at individual fighters because we will be here for a F****** lifetime.
So what I gather from this thread is...holding for no reason is a foul.
Holding when your hit and in trouble is ok....why?
You cant use the ropes to keep yourself up so why can you grab the other fighter and do the same?
Holding is a part of boxing in my opinion. Exessive holding sticks out like a sore thumb (in my eyes anyway) and the ref usually deals with it.
Ref's never deals with it mate ! Brock -vs.- Timor , Abraham vs. Miranda. Ruiz -vs. Everyone many many more ! ... the only ref who does a good job consistent now days is Jay Nady ,, Mills Lane was good.. he would make them fight outta of there. if your going to allow the clinch at least make them fight out of it. when the ref spends the whole fight braking up fighters it kills the momentum of the fight, and slants the advantage toward the holder, usually the taller fighter trying to get an advantage over the shorter fighter.
If a prizefighter comes into fight correct, He don't need to hold. why should we allow a fighter who has piss poor conditioning , bad technique or whatever , become everyone else’s problem? It’s his problem , and his problem alone . If he can't fight out of a tight spot , box his way free . then he gets knocked out , So be it ! good riddance I say, Why allow him to illegally clinch in order to try and make up for his deficiencies in the ring ? it’s a horrible watch, and is hurting boxing at the fan level. Watch Holyfield -vs.- Foreman, Holyfield -vs.- Bowe , Tua -vs. Ibabuchie that’s how two HW fighters should behave in the ring !
!
Bookmarks