Quote Originally Posted by Enrique
Doug Fischer is by a long chalk the most objective, rational boxing agony-aunt on the web. He's not a hater - God, I'm so effing tired of that meaningless term! His opinions are based on sound logic and almost always consistent criteria. He's already given Floyd his props as an all-time great, a breath-taking talent and a guaranteed hall-of-famer for his achievements at 130 and 135 - BUT points out that Pretty-Boy has not fought an opponent even close to being worthy of his undoubted skills for THREE AND A HALF YEARS!
Now, we all have our favourite fighters (me, I'm a Pacman) but please don't let your personal preferences turn your brains to jelly. We won't know how effective Floyd truly is at 140 or 147 until he fights an elite boxer from either division. I'd really like to see him do that but please don't be covering PB's perineum with tender little cat-licks until he does something worth getting excited about. That's all D-Fish is saying.
'Haters' - Jeez! That word just closes down all sane debate, don't it?
Oh, and remember Don Curry before you choke down too many inches of an undefeated superstar's d*ck.

Wright should be #1 p4p, and if Pac hadn't lost to Morrales, and had a draw with Marquez, he'd be 1 or 2. But Floyd is undefeated, regardless of weight. So, Floyd hasn't fought the top guys recently, he drops to #2. Who are you going to put ahead of him? Barrera? Hatton because of 1 big win? Noone. I don't hear you hacking on Hatton for fighting Collazo. I don't hear you hacking on Pac for fighting Larious. Both, Larious and Collazo are good fighters, about the same caliber as Gatti and Mitchell. You hack on Floyd because he is the best p4p. Why not the other guys? I totally agree, Floyd should step up the comp. Well, here is the forecast: Zab, then Oscar or Margarito, then the other one. Stiff enough competition? Everyone complains Floyd this, Floyd that, but don't complain when other fighters do the same things. Sounds exactly like some haters to me.