Quote Originally Posted by undefeated
Quote Originally Posted by hardrock
To Ice Cold Boxing & Tito_BHB

Check the records of Dempsey and Johnson, they are crap compared to the

people in the list. Most the fighters on the list have won the title more than once,

and some have defended the title for long periods of time.

Marciano - retired undefeated, but wasn't a good boxer, and only defended the title 6 times fighting has-been boxers whose prime was long lost.
Jack Johnson - Defended the title 8 times, never won another title after that.

Jack Dempsey - Won the title and defended it 5 times. Is he or Marciano better punchers
than Holmes, Tyson, Foreman? I don't think so.

Riddick Bowe - Won the title twice, but only defeated once. A couple of defences with each title. I prefer Riddick Bowe over Dempsey who would of been beaten by Bowe and Marciano who would not win against the more mobile heavyweights of today.


hypocriticaly u put joe louis as #1 whose oppositon was no better than rocky's--u cant diss marciano 4 his oppostion, and praise joe louis it makes no sense
I agree with undefeated on this one. I think hypocritically might be harsh because he might not see the contradictions in his logic and order. I agree that joe louis can't be put at the one slot and marciano be dissed for his opposition.