Bernard was a better boxer. That's why I don't let DLH's loss to him impact my thoughts on DLH. I had no expectation of DLH winning, so when he lost, it didn't make me think any less of him. I expected him to lose.Originally Posted by brazilianbomber
On the other hand, I thought DLH was the better, more complete boxer going into the Quartey, Trinidad, and Mosley fights. And in my opinion he went 0-2-1 in those fights. So I penalize him for those fights because he performed below my expectations.
I think you can penalize Trinidad for his performances at 160 and not Oscar without being hypocritical. Trinidad was a naturally bigger fighter. Trinidad fought the entire first part of his career at 147 and actually had to leave that weight class because it was too tough to make weight. DLH started all the way down at 130. He went up past 147 in search of big fights, not because he couldn't make weight.
I think Hopkins beat DLH because he was better AND bigger. I think Hopkins beat Tito simply because he was much better. Trinidad was just as hard a puncher as Hopkins, if not harder.
Bookmarks