Quote Originally Posted by amat
Quote Originally Posted by plinden
Quote Originally Posted by amat
Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea
It should be Peter. Younger fighter, more potential and he's been winning fights while Vitali has been sitting on the sidelines. James Toney may be at the end of his career, but wins over Toney are still more impressive than any of Vitali's wins in my opinion.
Vitali's claim to fame is getting his face ripped open by an old, out of shape Lennox Lewis.
Like you more every day you post man, agreed 100% here.
No, who cares: if Peter gets to meet Vitaly or or Maskaev? Actually; even better if he meets Vitaly because if he loses that, then he wont be champ until the Klits retire 4 years from now.
Who cares? Peter cares. He's the one who's given up 10% of 2 straight purses to face Maskaev. Meanwhile, the lasting impression Vitali left us with was pulling out of a fight with Rahman for the THIRD time, just a few days before the fight. Vitali is an old flake, while Peter is the guy who has EARNED his shot. Let Vitali climb he ladder the same way Peter did when Peter lost to Wlad.
Exactly. , Amat