Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
he said legend in the making mate
I read correctly. "Legend in the making" implies sure, future "legend" status. Again, let's not get out the annointing oil just yet.
which he very well could be just like joe c could depends on decisions they and promoters make in next year or so
If we go THAT route, let's just call EVERY fighter out there with an undefeated record, who have had decent competition "Legends in the Making". If Hatton is a L.I.T.M., why not Cotto? Why not PBF? Why not any number of fighters out there today? And why are just a handful of fighters from the past "legends", while more than a handful of fighters from today deserve to be called "legends in the making?" Don't follow the logic.
yes i was just mentioning hatton and calzaghe and i agree cotto and mayweather both could be legends of there era and im not calling every fighter with underfeated records legends in making but difference is calzaghe and hatton only have 3 fights left max and very could be legends of there era in there next 3 fights easily lets just put it this way

joe calzaghe

mikkel kessler

jermain taylor

roy jones clinton woods glen johnson bernard hopkins ect any of those 4 would do fine

and for hatton

castillo

corrales

cotto mayweather

if calzaghe or hatton could fight atleast 2 of those opps and win they would be legends no doubt