Quote Originally Posted by El Gamo
Where's P4P King? He NAILED that 1! Dam,I thought Collazo could do it,he needed to up his work rate though. Soooo,2 questions:

Was Collazo over rated and just wasn't as good as Hatton made him look? AND

Was Shane back to his best? Or was he doing just enough to win? I can't really tell by the RBR,and my fight is at 65%.
Collazo is not an easy fighter to look good against.
However you wanna rate him, a very quick slick defensive minded southpaw is never gonna be easy to look good against.
All kudos to Mosley for looking great against him.
I don't take anything away from Collazo. He could give trouble to any fighter on any given night with his style.
I said from the beginning that Collazo just doesn't press hard enough to beat someone quicker and slicker than him.
And whenever you have two quick slick boxers in there, the busier guy is most likely gonna win.
"Busy" is not in Collazo's vocabulary.
He doesn't have a lot of surprises.
Shane was just better than Collazo any way you slice it. But that's Sugar Shane. How many guys like him will Collazo have to face? Not many. His style just trumps Collazo's.
Against other top fighters who aren't as quick (Like a Margarito) I think he could give them a pretty damn frustrating night.

I'm sold on the idea that Shane is back in form.
And if he gets that year end fight with Mayweather, no one else in the sport has a better chance at beating Floyd in my opinion.