Quote Originally Posted by p4pking
Quote Originally Posted by El Gamo
Just out of curiosity,why shouldn't Pac be P4P number 1. You've said he shouldn't be but have not backed it up with anything.
Because he isn't as good as Mayweather Using your eyes is a method some ppl use to rate a fighters abilities
actually has pbf fought as good as oppenents pac has consistently so how can you easily say pbf is better just by using your eyes, pbf has always been prime even his should of lost to castillo, as for pac he just reach prime or showed sign of his prime stage, so actually we've only seen maybe one prime pacman fight. so how can you easily say pbf is better if you haven't seen much of prime pacman?

and if you disagree pacman is just recently coming onto prime, then can you actually say pac was prime in his win over mab and should of s.d win over jmm or close lost to em?

actually not prime pacman has already done more the pbf, defeating better oppenent wise.