Quote Originally Posted by bilbo
pbf has always been prime even his should of lost to castillo, as for pac he just reach prime or showed sign of his prime stage, so actually we've only seen maybe one prime pacman fight. so how can you easily say pbf is better if you haven't seen much of prime pacman?

and if you disagree pacman is just recently coming onto prime, then can you actually say pac was prime in his win over mab and should of s.d win over jmm or close lost to em?

actually not prime pacman has already done more the pbf, defeating better oppenent wise.

Hmm for a boxing God you certainly make some stupid postings.

By defintion prime means a boxers very best years, therefore if Floyd had always been prime then you are arguing for a logical impossibility as how you can always be the best you have ever been?

Secondly, if you do still persist in your belief that Floyd is always the best he has ever been then by definition he would have to be the number 1 p4p fighter in the world today as he keeps on getting better and better and therefore nobody could catch him, thus destroying the credibility of your own arguments.

For a boxing God I expected more
wow you blew it with this posting.

you says prime means their very best year? well has pbf have a greater year recently? if you base it on that hands down pac has been having better years then pbf for the past uhh 3 years. so that alone you should be saying pac is p4p #1

and yes i do say pbf has always been Great, pac wasn't. pbf actually look much better in the lower weights and thats a fact. NO DOUBT. who is better then castillo that pbf has fought after him? pbf look way amazing in the lower weight classes, RECENTLY he has fought weak oppenents compare to him titles don't mean shyt. baldo could of had 50 titles and zab, titles don't mean shyt so dont give the reason that they are good quality just cause baldo won the title uhh....from no other then zab.....and then beats uhh....gatti? don't makes sense only reason that fight took places wasn't because baldo was good it was because he had a title from zab who pbf beat and gatti who pbf beat. if baldo would of won a title from margarito instead of beating hype gatti then it WOULD OF MAKE MORE SENSE, but no it was kept in a circle of pbf easily whoop very very low risk.

look at winky and pac, they don't really have a title but they whoop all the very best already and they did that shyt a....s...a....p and pac whoop greats even when he wasn't PRIME which means very best or best can be. so do you think pac was as good as he was when he beat mab with just left straights and speed and relentless, and that should of s.d win for pac over jmm do you think pac was prime then? or the close lost to em was pac prime then?...........no pac was NOT PRIME THEN AND YET HE GAVE THE VERY BEST HELL IF NOT BEAT THE HELL OUT OF THEM.

and NO, just because i say pbf has been PRIME since in the lowerweight class that doesn't mean he should of been p4p #1 this whole time, NO EFFING way...why? because KING ROY was still unbeatable and bhop was just still so masterfull, and PBF even already PRIME was not a challenge to roys or bhops hold on p4p #1, as for pac even a few years back NOT PRIME, WAS already considered as a threat to pbf hold on p4p #1.....and keep in mind who did pbf beat when he was given the honorable thrown, NOBODY....it was because roy and bhop being dethrown by j.t and tarver.

come on bRotha, you should know this...