Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: What 'quality' do you consider most, when rating the Greats?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,816
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1147
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What 'quality' do you consider most, when rating the Greats?

    Quote Originally Posted by Smashup
    The ability and heart/guts to come back strong after a defeat and go on to dominate your division always impresses me.
    Most of the greats have done this
    Yes.

    Nowadays, fighters are encouraged to steer clear and keep that "O" on their record.

    But to come back from a defeat, is so much more difficult.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    16,122
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What 'quality' do you consider most, when rating the Greats?

    Who they fought,how they dealt with adversity and I am more impressed by someone who cleans the division properly then moves than someone who jumps weight classes picking and choosing who to fight. They must also fight the the best challenges available,no dusking or making excuses.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    7,509
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1326
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What 'quality' do you consider most, when rating the Greats?

    JUDASITY

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing