Quote Originally Posted by amat
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by amat
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by 'The Boxer'
i can't say that just yet.

tito gave oscar his first loss.( no matter what you think Tito got the win that night and says alot) he also beat vargas, mayorga, oba carr and joppy.

the best fighter cotto has fought off the top of my head is chop chop.
According to CompuBox punch analysis, De La Hoya landed 263 of 648 total punches, and Trinidad land 116 of 462. In terms of power punches, De La Hoya landed 120 of 277, and Trinidad 124 of 318.

oscar definetly should of won
You know, there's a reason the fight is scored by rounds I had it a draw because Oscar gave away the last 3 rounds and in those rounds, Tito clearly won even though he didn't land many punches.
best tito could of done through first 9 rounds is 6 rounds to 3 he didnt do enough imo to win and i dont know how judges could have first 9 rounds any closer than 6 rounds to 3
I thought it was a draw...so that fits I guess...but punch stats would suggest a blowout. And it wasn't...
Totally agree bro! As for the thread...hmmmm.well in terms of accomplishments,it's far far too early to say,Tito is a legend,Cotto in one in the making but still has a long time to go. I think in terms of skill,Cotto has more variety than Tito as he can also fight going backwards very well BUT Tito totally mastered the basics:the jab was shotgun like,the right hands and the left hook and in a fight,I think most of us would favour Tito by KO. So I don't think Cotto is better than Tito in any aspect just yet,it would be better to say he "Could" grow to be better than Tito but that is a big ask~!