Quote Originally Posted by Preme
Quote Originally Posted by tysonbruno
Quote Originally Posted by beds
Quote Originally Posted by Tito_BHB
Hah..You know what made me laugh..

Gammer said he didnt feel right and felt drained.. Im guessing that meant wieght drained..

My question to him...
How in the world can you be weight drained when you got tits?
gammer put alot of weight on for the fight as they didnt expect williams to lose 4 stone!!! heaviest he has ever fought at
He was only a few pounds heavier though he lost and thats that he needs to save his excuses for when Audley,Sprott or Skelton beat him no wonder he did'nt want Audley after he beat Williams Scott Gammer is S*** and one paced
its dissapointing to see any boxing 'fan' call another boxer 'S***' Gammer i highly doubt will ever make an impact on the world scene. if he turned Pro in his early 20s and had a good amature back round and wasn't trained by his dad he may of had a chane.

Scott is a good boxer, i just don't think his dad has what it takes to train him to compete with the top british heavys. He does lack power - and the game plan they used back fired on them; they gambbled on williams's body being weak and vunrable but it wasn't. IF you had any clue about boxing you wouldn't come out and say he was S*** - he kept that fight very close. it was lack of experience and maybe the williams fight came to soon for scott, there were little things fighters pick up to that he lacked, he alowed danny to walk him down and tire him out, watch the knock out scott had given 3 very hard minutes in the 8th and a hard min in the begining of the ninth he had little left as he ws out of shape. There is no doubt in my mind williams could feel gammers blow weakening and thats why he went in for the kill when he did.

Its realy said when S*** posters like your self start throwing words around like 'S***' when they describe honest hard working fighters like gammer. To be honest its sad and dissapointing when any boxer is called 'S***' im not saying overrate them all, but mention they lack certain attributes that seperate them from their 'peers' - but you can't do that can you? 'coz frankly you seem to have ur few fav fighters sheffield way it seems and just claim they are so great. i don't think i have ever seen you make a post where you have said anyhting about a technice, or attribute, style foot work, anyhting that makes a boxer beat the other one - it seems you know F*** all in fact apart from some boxers name.

just for being sad
Now tell me if im wrong but this site is for people's opinions on fights and fighters now i give my opinions only to keep getting pulled over them and get a slagging by people like yourself.Now if i was saying stuff like god Ricky Hatton and Joe Calzaghe are great they are so good i would be ok i could be in your lots gang truth is there not great they are just good in my opinion ive been following boxing since i was 5 so thats 21 year as a fan only to be told by you i know in your words fuck all apart from boxers names.Well thats your opinion and and unlike you i will take this onboard so you enjoy yourself on your soapbox giving me a hard time you boxing encyclopedia you and by the way Gammer is SHIT!