Sorry Danny G. Props to you for giving a good explanation but I still see it differently. Have to agree with Olympian. I think viewing it in slow motion gives the moment an over dramztized account. Same as when you see a punch connect in slow motion. Looks a lot worse than it actually is. But most of the head butts happened in split seconds. It is very difficult to ascertain if they were intentional or not.

One way of proving if Urkal is really a dirty fighter is to study his previous fights. If there were previous instances of Urkal fighting dirty than I will give it a second thought. He fought three world champions and lost. Were there compaints against him then? Can anyone do research and reply?

What was publicized was that he was a tough fighter and he showed his toughness in this fight. He definitely lost to Cotto so we all should leave it at that.