I don't understand why anyone would want to see a Barrera-Pac over a Marquez-Pac rematch.
Barrera wasn't even competitive against Pac, isn't interest in a rematch usually generated from some question or doubt about the original? What could possibly be left to be answered from Barrera-Pac 1? It was complete domination.
Marquez-Pac, on the other hand, still has some unresolved issues. While I believe Pac should have won that fight, albeit narrowly, I thought that after that huge first round Marquez had his way the rest of the fight. What would happen in the rematch? Would it be Pac's power or Marquez's defense and counter-punching?
I for one would much rather see the latter.
Bookmarks