Quote Originally Posted by killersheep
Quote Originally Posted by Majesty
Quote Originally Posted by killersheep
Quote Originally Posted by Majesty
Quote Originally Posted by killersheep
Quote Originally Posted by Majesty
like I said, Barerra is going to dominate Marquez.
Just like Green dominated Miranda?
Everybody picks a fight wrong. But at least I'm brave enough to put my opinion out there to my belief rather then mess around I make an out and out prediction and I know people get predictions wrong but I get over it. Why do you bring up my wrong prediction as if thats all I make?
I just had to take the jab that was open, as far as I can recall that was the first fight we opposed each other. Just bustin your balls a bit. I'll be the first to admit I've made wrong picks, I'm actually quite consistant at getting things wrong

Summary of my rant: Marquez takes it and I would challenge you to some sort of wager, but I know you don't gamble.
I don't gamble, but I'll make a wager. How about a sig bet?
Sure thing Barrera vs. Marquez wins by any means.

Majesty wins with ANY Barrera win.

Killersheep wins with ANY Marquez win.

Bet is null in the case of a draw.

How are those terms?

Proposed sig bet reads

Winner of said bet is a boxing genius, and I cannot compete with him.

I'm ready for your counter-offer.
Majesty wins with ANY Barrera win.

Killersheep wins with ANY Marquez win.

Bet is null in the case of a draw.

Agreed


Proposed sig bet reads

Winner of said bet is a boxing genius, and I cannot compete with him and must put it in his signature in big bold letters until they pick right against the winner of that bet in another fight.

How about that