Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea
I see people throwing out accusations of corrupt judging, but you have to ask yourself, why would corrupt judges favor Marquez??
Barrera is the bigger name. Barrera has the bigger fanbase. Barrera has made much more money for the state of Nevada over the years than Marquez has.
Barrera-Pacquiao II would be a bigger money maker for Vegas than Marquez-Pacquiao II. There is no incentive for judges to be biased or corrupt in favor of Marquez.

There are plenty of opportunites to criticize boxing for being corrupt, but I don't see how this is one of them.
Very good point.