Hard to say. I think Marquez was the best of them in his prime, but the others have more depth to their resume.

As far as against elite comp, Marquez has the edge. He fought even up with Pac in a fight many think he won (including me), and once the dust settles he'll be seen as a clear winner over MAB.

Morales has a win over MAB that he probably shouldn't have but he also has a questionable loss to him. Either way he's 1-2. He's the only of the 3 to have a clear win over Pac, but he's 1-2 there also with 2 KO losses.

MAB has the 2 wins over Morales, and the win over Hamed which were great wins. But he got smoked by Pac in one-sided fashion. My big problem with MAB is people always hype him up as this impeccably great fighter, til he gets beaten up and then they act like nothing happened. He was the next big thing until Junior Jones KHTFO. He beats Hamed and he's back... Until Pac beat him like a prostitute. He beats a faded Morales to regain his stardom and then he struggles with Juarez and loses to Marquez. I don't think it's that he's inconsistent, he's just a half a level below where people seem to see him.

1)Marquez - 2-0 against elite fighters and undefeated overall on my card

2) Barrera - 3-3 against elite fighters. Seems to deal with contenders consistently for the most part.

3) Morales - 2-4 against elite fighters. Struggles alot with contenders.