Quite a discusssion here's my two cents. Its easy for Floyd to make stupid comments about SRL because he's too old now to make a comeback and see him about it. . Next: Oscar and Shane were legitimate knockout artists at lightweight (that being Shane's optimal weight where he was dangerous with either hand) and strength and stylewise I think Shane in particular would have given Duran all he could handle. I call it a pick em fight but I think the fight would've been Mosley's to lose. I think Duran could have taken out PBF at lightweight (as long as he doesn't do a SRL impression which is not his style to do), and the fight with Oscar has a lot of variables with either one of them winning but my thought is Duran winning 2 out of 3 or 3 out of 5 etc....

Roy more physical prowess than Floyd, and better power. Besides that Floyd has better technique and a style that (should) prolong his career longer than Roys. I think Roy in his prime is a more entertaining fighter and p4p head to head in their primes, Roy beats Mayweather IMO (which is preposterous because there is almost no scenario where the two could meet).

By my count Roy won 8 or 9 rounds in Tarver I and everytime he decided to punch (and not rest on the ropes while Tarver got in his licks) Tarver had NOTHING for Roy. PBF struggled against Zab, I didn't see that...I saw him take longer to adjust to someone with comparable speed, but I don't think that in any way bothered him or troubled him. Castillo was the only fight where it seemed apparent that Floyd was having problems.