Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote Originally Posted by tysonbruno
JMM is a well schooled fighter but i believe Naz would have ko'd him like i said he got dropped 3 times in one round by Pac and Naz hits harder than Pac also Naz would have ko'd morales too he got rocked about abit by Injin Chi i just think an on form Naz would have beat them all Barrera did'nt even beat the Naz we all knew he was just seeking the ko no boxing as such Naz beat himself in my opinion
Is that why Naz took the fight when it was offered to him?
According to some of you guys that's when Naz was still at his best and yet he didn't take the fight... Hmmmm!!!
But yet once he fought MAB he was no longer the same Naz
So what I don't understand is how do you guys determine he could beat sooo many people if when he was at his best he turned down fights! and when (according to some of you) he was no longer at his best he lost...

But yet! he seems to beat everyone in matchups...

Not really, been checking Hamed out on youtube, Billy Hardy Steve Robinson Tom Johnson Kevin Kelley Molina, and one I posted earlier in this thread and he looked pretty good, but then I watched his fight with Kid Vegas(who;s name slips my mind because im tired ) And he looked completely different so I'd say you'd have a legit point if you said he wasn't on form anymore when he fought Barerra, but at the same time you must say had Barerra not been at the top of his game and the best Barerra he had ever been up until that point he may have lost as well. Barerra was the greatest he had ever been that night, and nobody would have beaten him that night and Barerra is a legend so I don't see a shame in Hamed losing to him just like I don't see a shame in Trinidad losing to Hopkins. Doesn't hurt your legacy imo. Now if Barerra had won and then gotten beat bad and retired then you'd be saying Hamed was an overrated so and so but he lost to freaking BARERRA!!! And a prime Barerra that was the best he had ever been. No shame there imo.