Quote Originally Posted by Taeth
I think the difference is skill vs. athleticism. P4P Oscar had more power, speed, etc., but Kessler is the better boxer IMO. He is more versatile, but he has also fought worse openents which makes him look better.
I think the fact that Oscar won world titles in 6 different weights and had infintately more exposure makes it hard to compare them TBH. I said a while back that soon Mikkel will be entering peoples p4p lists and I reckon that time is rapidly approaching . Already he is an undefeated unified world champ. I can see him being the man who dominates the division after Calzaghe. He can also move up to light heavy and be the boss there too . If Woods has good sense he wont fight Kessler in Denmark .

The guy has a bright future but its a bit soon for comparrissons with De La Hoya