Like KillerSheep I would use a points system. I would just base mine a bit different.

We will use the Heavyweight Division since it is simplist.

Points are Based on more than just amount of fights like it seems some organazitions do...EG a guy with a record of 35-0 doesnt deserve a higher ranking then a guy 25-5 if the 25-5 guy has fought nothing but the top tier and never lost to anyone but a rank opponent while the 35-0 guy has never beaten a top 10 guy...Points will be awarded accordingly

QUALITY OF WINS 1-10 POINTS..THE MORE RANKED OPPONENTS YOU HAVE WINS OVER THE HIGHER YOUR SCORE (Opponents being ranked at time of fight)

HOW OFTEN YOU FIGHT--If a guy only fights once or twice a year then no you dont get as much credit as a guy who does 4 or 5 times..Each bout gets 5 points based on the last 12 months

AMOUNT OF BOUTS--Though I believe quality is more important quanity also has some clout. I give 1 point for each win.

SIGNIFIGANCE OF LAST 5 BOUTS- You can have all the wins against big names on the way down or no hopers you ant but what signifigance was the bout for the division? What did it prove?...If a guy has been in an eliminator,,a title fight ( win or lose) and a fight with another ranked fighter he did more to improve the divisiomn and clear up any confusion on who is who than a guy who fought 5 guys ranked 20th and below. I give 5 points for each bout of that manner.

PERFORMANCE--How did you perform in your last bout? A win is a win right? WRONG!! If all you did was hit and hold or were sluggish,,showing signs of deterioration,, the lower the rating...But if you stepped up to the plate,,Proved your heart,,,showed a constant level of skill since your last bout or improvement the higher you score...Points are a 1-10 possibility based on these qualities or lack of

OVER ALL QUALITY--Add the scores,,list the top 10 scores accordingly,,Now add for each position The higher you are the more points you get. You recieve 5 points for evfery fighter ranked underneath you
EG if #9 has 50 points they get 5 more to the total because they have one fighter ranked beneath them so the total would be 55---Higher you go the more you earn...If the #1 guy has 100 points lets say he has 9 guys ranked under him so add another 45 points. If the next month the fighter has the second amount of higest points he would be at # 2 + lose 5 points for another fighter climbing above him so this can work as a plus or minus for a fighter add them all up and their is your rankings...This system would only be applied to the top 10 fighters...Anyone under 10th would have all the rest of system implemented as stated.

To decide the Champion I would take the 2 highest totals and make them fight it out winner being champion..........

A Champion may only defend against a top 10 ranked opponent.....1 mandatory every 3 fights

Here is an example of my system Lets pretend they are not champions as of yet and overall quality points will be based on their box rec ranking


Wladamir Klitschko Nicolay Valuev Oleg Maskaev

Quality of Wins 9 3 5

How often he fights 15 15 10

Amount of Wins 48 46 35

Signifigance of Bouts 10 4 5

Performance 10 6 4

Overall Quality
ToTal= 92 74 59


We Will leave off over all quality due to the fact this would be the first month.. I based
signifigance on carrer whole


Klitschko and Valuev would fight for the title