What have PBF done is the first 6 rounds?

**spade** · 04-10-2006 04:53 AM

In the judges scorecard it was a lopsided contest.

But PBF started to dominated in the middle of the fight, it was Zab who is more active.

Based on my scorecard, until the 8th round, the fight is even but how come it was a total domination?

I'm not a Judah fan, but i'm a boxing fan who won't be fooled by this kind of judging.

Just my thoughts

**BABABOOEY** · 04-10-2006 04:55 AM

I thought this fight was pretty easy to score. Judah clearly won rds 1,2, and 4. Arguably also won rd 12. PBF clearly won rds 5-11. And he seemed to win rd 3. That's 8 rds to 4. 116-112. I dont know how that judge had it 119-109. Thats obsurd.

**MRMANICK** · 04-10-2006 05:01 AM

To me the most fair score was 116-112. At best zab only won 4 rounds and 1 or 2 could of went the other way and I wouldn't be mad. People say pbf should of lost a point cause his glove touched and he should of but judah should have also been penalized for his intentional low blow so the scores would still be even.

**spade** · 04-10-2006 05:11 AM

Agreed

But how come judges who are actually in the side of the ring missed some of the actions?

I think Judges should also be judge on how they fair to their scoring, they submit their classcard to a higher body and be reviewed and also evaluated.

Or have their eyesights checked

**MRMANICK** · 04-10-2006 05:18 AM

Originally Posted by spade

Agreed

But how come judges who are actually in the side of the ring missed some of the actions?

I think Judges should also be judge on how they fair to their scoring, they submit their classcard to a higher body and be reviewed and also evaluated.

Or have their eyesights checked

Thats not a bad idea. But i saw a few judah fans(i won't mention names but you know who you are.) on the board try to say they scored the fight 115-113. Please, 119-109 is off but to go any lower than 116-112 is just as off.