
Originally Posted by
SalTheButcher
ok, so zab shoud be banned for a punch that is thorown in EVERY OTHER FIGHT but roger is in no way wrong?
it's irrelevant what roger did, since zab should have already been dq'd at that point. you know, for what rjj and many other fighters have been dq'd for--actually endangering someone's life with a cheap-shot to the back of the head (and without "pillow gloves," i might add). even if that doesn't get him dq'd, though, roger certainly doesn't get floyd dq'd, since time had already been called following zab's cheap shots--thus, no "entering the ring during the action" violation. this is a total red herring anyway--you and i and everyone else knows that the only effect of roger's behavior on the fight was that it shook floyd somewhat for the beginning of R11. zab having a 50 year old man come after him can't explain why he lost most of the rounds preceding that and had already lost the fight on points by the time it happened. maybe you should go back to your excuse that floyd's soft gloves somehow caused zab to lose the fight (despite the fact that his chin would have crumbled with any other gloves).
Bookmarks