Julius Rain,
Are these percentages according to you?
Just curious as to how you determined them.


Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain
i don't think you can rate anyone with pacman not hamed valero or juarez. pac is very known to be a nonstop action pack fighter but he has levels of himself.
IMO, I think Naz is more of a devastating puncher then Pac & Valero. Pac is speed + volume of punches = his KO.
Naz was more of Power = his KO. And Valero IMO has ONLY fought 1 world class opponent so you really can't compare to him to Naz & Pac who have fought better opp. then Valero at the moment.
He (Naz) did have that I've never denied it. (For those of you who are thinking about jumping on me go back through my posts and you'll see I give him that)

Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain
I'd say pacman was 100% against 3rd morales fight.
Of course.

Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain
90% was with jmm and mab.
Yeah! right
Against MAB he was as 100% as 100% could be thats why he took advantage of the issues MAB was having. Now that PAC wasn't developed yet is a different story but he was 100% for what he was at that time.
This is funny against JMM, IMO I think he was also 100% I mean he dropped JMM 3 fwocken times in 1 rd. thats as 100% as he can be. The fact that JMM caught on to his plan of attack and anihilated him for the entire reminder of the fight DOES NOT mean he wasn't 100%. He was it was just that JMM figured him out and shut him out.

Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain
80% and below are against lesser fighters, with the solis fight he was prolly below 70%.
70% your being generous if you pay attention to the 1st 3 rounds PAC threw his Manila Ice several times landing only 3 that I counted. He was off and Solis caught Pac several times. Pac looked awckward and out of sync in the begining. In the end the only thing that was surprising was that it took him that long to stop Solis.

Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain
pac only needs to be atleast 80% to beat the likes of valero hamed or juarez.
Now to say that a fighter would ONLY need to be atleast 80% is absurd, you need to be well prepared and 100% at all times when your stepping in the ring. That 80% statement you made makes no sense.
You can't be serious about Valero, Valeros still too green for Pac that fight makes no sense to me this year Valero still has some road to cover IMO. All those 1 rd. fights mean nothing on World Class level.
Juarez would be overwhelmed by Pacs speed, but Pac better watch out cause Juarez hits like a ton of bricks.
Against Naz, well it would be an even fight as far as percentages cause we all know Nazs preparations
So both fighters would come in at like 70-80% prepared.

Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain
100% pacman ruins anyone a dozen power punches at a time. but out of all pacmans fight he was only prime at the third fight with morales.
Now I know your joking, soo according to you Pac is his Prime for Morales III but came in at BELOW 70% for the Solis fight.
What kind of prime is this the Julius Rain prime sys. IMO Pac started his Prime when he beat MAB and hes going through it now.

Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain
pacmans oppenent better hope he never goes in against them 100%.
p4p pac knocks out anyone highest level vs highest level.
Why do I have a feeling tha if Pac & JMM meet and Pac defeats JMM you'll say Pac came in at 100%.
And if JMM defeats Pac you'll say Pac was at less then 70%.