Quote Originally Posted by MR T
Quote Originally Posted by THE Bigragu
Quote Originally Posted by MR T
Quote Originally Posted by Unknowndonor
Don't see what the fuss is about SRL. He was a punk. Duran beat him, and he got a gift against Hagler. And, he ducked Pryor badly, who would have taken it to him. And he did hand pick alot of his opponents. Great fighter, but no different than some of the fighters today. F-SRL.
no different to pbf? how do you think pbf would fair against duran, hagler , and hearns? and im sick of peeps saying hagler was robbed, it was a good win for leonard who was a welter and hadnt been in ring for 3 yrs......it would have been more contraversial if hagler got the decision....leonard won by 1-2 rds easy.....
Hagler was ROBBED!!! Hearns beat Leonard the second time around...a friggin draw?!!!!! come'on....
yes i agree that hearns beat leonard 2nd fight he was lucky to walk away with a draw but leonard won the hagler fight there was no robbery , i dont know when the last time u saw the fight but you should watch it again to refresh ur memory.......alot of peeps say robery but imaginbe the outcry if hagler had won! there wopuld be a bigger case for leonard being robbed if hagler won..........peace out
Yes i watched it on saturday it was no robbery i had Leonard sneaking it, in the latest issue of Boxing Monthly they do a big rite up on the fight and i think they get the verdict of ten writers/boxing journos and like 9 out of the 10 say leaonard won the fight, it was far from a robbery!!