Quote Originally Posted by eagle
Myself being more of a boxing purist can see how floyd won. More accurate punches, hardly got hit etc.
But would boxing have been better off if DLH won. I mean he was the aggressor and watching the fight with a lot of casual fans i could see how they were a little confused at how he lost.
Just after peoples opinions on this. Should the aggressor in a fight be given more points?
I agree. I think the aggressor should have won the fight. Not really a dominant performance by either boxer. ODLH obviously hit harder as there was a tiny mouse on PBF right eye and hardly a scratch on ODLH even though he was out punched. I agree with the split decision part.