Johnson like HAGLER WHAT THE HELL NO WAY![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:come on Johnson is not fit to carry his jock strap
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Johnson like HAGLER WHAT THE HELL NO WAY![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:come on Johnson is not fit to carry his jock strap
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Just fights abit like him thats allOriginally Posted by Counter
Marvin Hagler,a highly under rated All Time Great,with P4P one of the best chins ever. The ultimate seek and destroy fighter.
Marvelous was the man RJJ would give him a good fight though but in my opinion hagler would end up tko win cus he just keeps coming doesn't matter what you hit him with.
Leonard didn't beat Hagler, and Hopkins didn't beat Jones, IMO.
Hagler was a beast. Hagler vs BHOP, prime for prime would be a good fight. I give the edge to Hagler. Higher work rate, and more aggressiveness.
As for Jones vs Hagler, prime for prime. Well, it could go either way. Either Jones gets a UD, or gets caught late, and Hagler KOs him.
I still think Hop beat JonesOriginally Posted by Unknowndonor
So does,Bhop,and for that matter from the way he keeps dodging a fight,so does Jones
Again,your trying to compair the late Bhop,against the early one,he clutched grabbed taking away ability for agression,while doing it in a way where he could still hit you.
Really agressive guys were tailor made for him back then,because he could sucker them in tight.
He shocked everyone by fighting away with Tito
Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
I've seen alot of BHOP's early fights, and he did good against aggresiveness, but Hagler fought other guys like that, and was never grabbed, or denied. Like I said, it would be a good fight, but Hagler wasn't one dimentional like Tito. And Hagler's chin was alot better than Tito's, and I'm as huge tito fan.
BHOP isn't, or wasn't ever strong enough to smother Hagler. Sorry.
Jones would lose to BHOP now, but he didn't lose then.
Sorry if i have read this wrong but did you say Hopkins beat Jones ??Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
You kidding,Bhop's a natural Cruiser/Light Heavy,hes an ox for the middleweight divisionOriginally Posted by Unknowndonor
He couldnt beat Tito,because he couldnt take Tito's power
Guess who had the power
He couldnt beat DLH because of his superior skill
Guess who had the skill
He couldnt beat Tarver because he wouldnt have power moving up
Guess who had the power again
People allways say Bhop cant win,against anyone
But somehow...........
He got the decisionOriginally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
But I dont think he won it
Now if hed fight Bhop again we could say one way or another,but Roy ALLWAYS has an excuse why he cant
I knew he would beat all three of them. But Hagler would beat all three of them too. So, IMO, Hagler still beats BHOP, IN A CLOSE FIGHT.Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
Im sorry but Jones vs Hopkins isn't even debatable Jones easily beat Hopkins.Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
Even Hopkins admitted Roy won their fight. End of discussion. Roy vs. Hagler would be very interesting.
Originally Posted by southpaw09
Styles makes fights.
Jones's style on paper is the perfict style to beat Hagler.
Balls
Hagler ramrod jab inside with them uppercuts; the pain he would have put on RJJ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks