Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by Clydey_2_Times
I'm inclined to agree.  I had Oscar ahead.  That said, he faded in the championship rounds.  Had Floyd faced a younger DLH, he would have been comprehensively outclassed, surprisingly ( I feared for DLH somewhat coming into the fight).  Oscar lost it, rather than Mayweather won it.  I never thought I would say this, but Mayweather looked utterly out of his depth in the early rounds.

I'm very disappointed that DLH didn't get the decision.  We saw the golden boy from one generation face the golden boy from another generation.  The elder golden boy proved beyond doubt that he was the better fighter.  Not that he needed to.  Comparitive achievements already dictate that fact.
Well you must count missed flurries then because Oscar didn't win that fight and thats debatable if Oscar would win in his prime just face facts he is good fighter but never beat a great fighter and had gifts against Whitaker Quartey and Sturm and i wouldn't like to bet if he really would win in his prime and he didn't prove he is better fighter at all he lost i think you need to rewatch the fight.
ICB you summed it all up right there  #842  People get excited with a few jabs and horseshit flurries that never land... Of course people dont talk about how Oscar got rocked a few times either, but Floyd didnt... Floyd won Oscar didnt lose it