Quote Originally Posted by Britkid
Quote Originally Posted by p4pking
Quote Originally Posted by Britkid
Quote Originally Posted by p4pking
Yea to say Wlad or Brewster would beat Tyson is really laughable and nothing else.. Come on. Vitali would have a shot.
You are not reading what I said; Wlad has all the tools to not just beat him, but to easily beat him. Brewster I said was a 3 in 10 shot.

Tyson never, ever beat someone who stood up to him.
And I suppose from his losses to ROSS PURRITY, LAMON BREWSTER, and CORRIE SANDERS, you couldn't deduct the same thing about Wlad? Come on... And not to mention the fact that Tyson was simply faster and Wlad could not take his power for one second. As for Brewster, really.. That's just hilarious, Lamon would be cannon fodder for a prime Tyson.. But he wasn't for Wlad. Wonder why..
Styles make fights, Tyson always struggled (and that included in his prime), against big tall athletic fighters. And Wlad has all the tools to beat Tyson, even more so than his brother. Wlad would beat Tyson in his prime, more than he would lose to Tyson.

Brewster is a serious puncher, who would land a bomb and beat Tyson in 30% of bouts, if had met whilst both were in their prime.

Tyson lacks certain mental tools to be this great 'god like figure' some people perceive him to be IMO.
if thats the case then im tired of hearing how awful this era of heavys are compared to years past ................ i dont know how u can say a prime tyson--who is going to the hall of fame..gets kayoed by two guys who arent even good enough to sleep on the fronts steps in wlad and brewster.........i mean a shot mike tyson kayoed cliff etienne withe first punch he threw and lamon lost to that same etieene...............and cliff has no chin..........