Quote Originally Posted by VanChilds
what needs to happen is a federal commission that only recognizes one belt, preferably the Rings and put all of these blood sucking pariahs out of busniess
i have one major problem with the belt and thats the fact that it allows its belt to be determined between nr 1 and 3.. a good example was the calzaghe vs lacy fight, joe the nr 1 , and lacy nr 3.. it the ring belt is available, it should only be determined by nr 1 and 2.. every other world championship is a manner of nr 1 and 2 determing who is the best..

and what if the scenario of calzaghe and ottke replays itself (sure calzaghe was better).. but the ring belt kept changing from one to the other, as i recall..

but what would determine, who is holding the belt.. then it would be down to, who has fought who, which fight was most impressive and in the end, there would be to much controversy involved..

i really agree with those stating, that the should rank other titleists, i find it close to stupid, that they dont..

it could easely be done, wbc, wba, ibf and i would also maybe include wbo..

, so in every way it would be to benefit the sport(mandatorys with unifications fights) and also separating the real top fighters from the hyped ones.. logics would say, there was 4 champions, thereby they would leave only 6 other places in the top 10, not ranking them would leave 9 places in the top 10.. we would see more equal matchups, bigger fights as the contenders and champions would have to step up ..