Tito was magic, leave him where he is and kick Oscar off.
Tito was magic, leave him where he is and kick Oscar off.
Remember the good old days, we miss you Marco!
I like to think of SweetP "all time" as a lightweight, but when ranking him as a welter
I still think he cracks the top ten.
I agree though I think that Mayweather at least could have beaten any of those guys.Originally Posted by p4pking
You think Mayweather would have beaten SRL or Hearns? I don't see it happening at all. Noone today at welter could, or in the last few years. prime DLH would have the best chance but would still come up short IMO Hearns and SRL are easily the best welters in a long time and yet to be surpassed.
No, he was a 135lberOriginally Posted by SalTheButcher
![]()
Brown and Honeyghan lacked the longevity to be put on the list. Breland was too flaky; McGirt, was unlucky to be around with Whitaker. Benitez is top 10 140 and 154lber, but although he beat Palomino, all everyone remembers about him is losing to SRL.Originally Posted by mokele
Davis is little more than an adequate alphabet champ IMO. Taylor was shot by the time he got up to 147lbs.
In my opinion, it's hard to favor anybody head to head against Hearns at welterweight. Leonard beat him but it took a miraculous effort to do it way behind on points and with a badly swollen eye. Hearns was a physical marvel, a rangy, small-boned guy with broad shoulders, a wide variety of punches, a great jab and a big overhand right. I have yet to see anyone who would have had much of any chance at all of outpointing him at 147 lbs. Maybe another very tall welterweight such as Mark Breland or Maurice "the thin man" Blocker would have stood a slight chance. In order to beat Tommy Hearns you had to knock him out.Originally Posted by p4pking
I know that Floyd Mayweather Jr. is fast, but Hearns had a 78" reach. Picture Antonio Margarito, add 2" in height, make him faster, give him a better jab and overhand right and you're close to the offensive fighter that Hearns was. If Hearns had the chin of Marvin Hagler he would have been the greatest fighter who ever lived.
Agree with u totally there mokele, I dont see anyone from today beatin Hearns. Noone beats SRL or Duran for my money either. No matter what you say about Floyd being quicker etc. SRL was just one of those fighters when you watch, you always know he'll win, somehow. And Duran IMO is one of the best P4P all time, noone of today touches him.Originally Posted by mokele
Mayweather wouldnt be able to beat SRL, Hearns or Duran IMO.Originally Posted by Taeth
Spot on, Mokele - Hearns was truly an awesome fighting machine.Originally Posted by mokele
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
I think PBF would do well, he has all the punches and defense in the book, and like SRL
he has the ability to adapt to whatever his opponents throw at him (with the exception
of the castillo fight, which was a fluke bad performance IMO)
I give Mayweather full credit UD vs Hearns
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Go back and watch 147lbs Hearns, Mayweather is made to measure for The Hitman. Lil Floyd lacks the tools to get past that jab, and sooner or later a right hand will find Mayweather's chin.Originally Posted by killersheep
He will probably last a lot longer than Cuevas, but in the end, I foresee a similar type of KO for the Motor City Cobra.![]()
I agree... Hearns is something else. If only he had a chin! Imagine that.Originally Posted by Britkid
Britkid, what do you think of the up and comer Paul Williams. Good speed and power, good boxing skills (still a little raw), 6'1, 147lbs, and a southpaw! 28-0 at the moment, and I think he's top 15 right now. Think he might have the tools to cause some trouble in welterweight a little down the road?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks