Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28

Thread: Welterweight division overall all-time best

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    3,715
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1102
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Welterweight division overall all-time best

    Tito was magic, leave him where he is and kick Oscar off.
    Remember the good old days, we miss you Marco!

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Welterweight division overall all-time best

    I like to think of SweetP "all time" as a lightweight, but when ranking him as a welter
    I still think he cracks the top ten.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1510
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Welterweight division overall all-time best

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking
    Don't know.. Today is good though, that's for sure. early 80's would possibly be better.. SRL, Duran, hearns... i think that pretty much blows MAyweather Hatton or anyone else out of the water.
    I agree though I think that Mayweather at least could have beaten any of those guys.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1338
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Welterweight division overall all-time best

    You think Mayweather would have beaten SRL or Hearns? I don't see it happening at all. Noone today at welter could, or in the last few years. prime DLH would have the best chance but would still come up short IMO Hearns and SRL are easily the best welters in a long time and yet to be surpassed.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,396
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Welterweight division overall all-time best

    Quote Originally Posted by SalTheButcher
    Quote Originally Posted by Britkid
    1 Ray Robinson
    2 Ray Leonard
    3 Kid Gavilan
    4 Emile Griffith
    5 Henry Armstrong
    6 Jose Napoles
    7 Felix Trinidad
    8 Oscar De La Hoya
    9 Thomas Hearnsl
    10 Carmen Bassillo

    Mentions to: Tommy Ryan, ‘Mysterious’ Billy Smith, ‘The original’ Joe Walcott, Mike Sullivan, Jack Britton, Ted ‘Kid’ Lewis, Mickey Walker, Jackie Fields, Barney Ross, Jim McLarnin, Fritzie Zivic, Red Cochrane, Benny ‘Kid’ Paret, Luis Rodriguez, Carlos Palomino, Pipino Cuevas, Roberto Duran, Don Curry, Marlon Starling, Pernell Whitaker and Shane Mosley
    no benny loenard?
    No, he was a 135lber

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,396
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Welterweight division overall all-time best

    Quote Originally Posted by mokele
    Quote Originally Posted by Britkid
    1 Ray Robinson
    2 Ray Leonard
    3 Kid Gavilan
    4 Emile Griffith
    5 Henry Armstrong
    6 Jose Napoles
    7 Felix Trinidad
    8 Oscar De La Hoya
    9 Thomas Hearns
    10 Carmen Basilio

    Mentions to: Tommy Ryan, ‘Mysterious’ Billy Smith, ‘The original’ Joe Walcott, Mike Sullivan, Jack Britton, Ted ‘Kid’ Lewis, Mickey Walker, Jackie Fields, Barney Ross, Jim McLarnin, Fritzie Zivic, Red Cochrane, Benny ‘Kid’ Paret, Luis Rodriguez, Carlos Palomino, Pipino Cuevas, Roberto Duran, Don Curry, Marlon Starling, Pernell Whitaker and Shane Mosley
    Also worthy of mention are Simon Brown, Mark Breland, Lloyd Honeyghan, Wilfred Benitez, Buddy McGirt. Personally I feel that Brown and Honeyghan were great ones, either inside the top 10 or just below.

    I suppose that Aaron Davis and Meldrick Taylor are worthy of mention too, although Taylor spent most of his career at other weights, and Davis often had trouble making 147 lbs.
    Brown and Honeyghan lacked the longevity to be put on the list. Breland was too flaky; McGirt, was unlucky to be around with Whitaker. Benitez is top 10 140 and 154lber, but although he beat Palomino, all everyone remembers about him is losing to SRL.

    Davis is little more than an adequate alphabet champ IMO. Taylor was shot by the time he got up to 147lbs.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    191
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Welterweight division overall all-time best

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking
    You think Mayweather would have beaten SRL or Hearns? I don't see it happening at all. Noone today at welter could, or in the last few years. prime DLH would have the best chance but would still come up short IMO Hearns and SRL are easily the best welters in a long time and yet to be surpassed.
    In my opinion, it's hard to favor anybody head to head against Hearns at welterweight. Leonard beat him but it took a miraculous effort to do it way behind on points and with a badly swollen eye. Hearns was a physical marvel, a rangy, small-boned guy with broad shoulders, a wide variety of punches, a great jab and a big overhand right. I have yet to see anyone who would have had much of any chance at all of outpointing him at 147 lbs. Maybe another very tall welterweight such as Mark Breland or Maurice "the thin man" Blocker would have stood a slight chance. In order to beat Tommy Hearns you had to knock him out.

    I know that Floyd Mayweather Jr. is fast, but Hearns had a 78" reach. Picture Antonio Margarito, add 2" in height, make him faster, give him a better jab and overhand right and you're close to the offensive fighter that Hearns was. If Hearns had the chin of Marvin Hagler he would have been the greatest fighter who ever lived.

  8. #23
    AC-Cobra Guest

    Default Re: Welterweight division overall all-time best

    Quote Originally Posted by mokele
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking
    You think Mayweather would have beaten SRL or Hearns? I don't see it happening at all. Noone today at welter could, or in the last few years. prime DLH would have the best chance but would still come up short IMO Hearns and SRL are easily the best welters in a long time and yet to be surpassed.
    In my opinion, it's hard to favor anybody head to head against Hearns at welterweight. Leonard beat him but it took a miraculous effort to do it way behind on points and with a badly swollen eye. Hearns was a physical marvel, a rangy, small-boned guy with broad shoulders, a wide variety of punches, a great jab and a big overhand right. I have yet to see anyone who would have had much of any chance at all of outpointing him at 147 lbs. Maybe another very tall welterweight such as Mark Breland or Maurice "the thin man" Blocker would have stood a slight chance. In order to beat Tommy Hearns you had to knock him out.

    I know that Floyd Mayweather Jr. is fast, but Hearns had a 78" reach. Picture Antonio Margarito, add 2" in height, make him faster, give him a better jab and overhand right and you're close to the offensive fighter that Hearns was. If Hearns had the chin of Marvin Hagler he would have been the greatest fighter who ever lived.
    Agree with u totally there mokele, I dont see anyone from today beatin Hearns. Noone beats SRL or Duran for my money either. No matter what you say about Floyd being quicker etc. SRL was just one of those fighters when you watch, you always know he'll win, somehow. And Duran IMO is one of the best P4P all time, noone of today touches him.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,609
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1082
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Welterweight division overall all-time best

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking
    Don't know.. Today is good though, that's for sure. early 80's would possibly be better.. SRL, Duran, hearns... i think that pretty much blows MAyweather Hatton or anyone else out of the water.
    I agree though I think that Mayweather at least could have beaten any of those guys.
    Mayweather wouldnt be able to beat SRL, Hearns or Duran IMO.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    In my own little Universe
    Posts
    10,053
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2264
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Welterweight division overall all-time best

    Quote Originally Posted by mokele


    In my opinion, it's hard to favor anybody head to head against Hearns at welterweight. Leonard beat him but it took a miraculous effort to do it way behind on points and with a badly swollen eye. Hearns was a physical marvel, a rangy, small-boned guy with broad shoulders, a wide variety of punches, a great jab and a big overhand right. I have yet to see anyone who would have had much of any chance at all of outpointing him at 147 lbs. Maybe another very tall welterweight such as Mark Breland or Maurice "the thin man" Blocker would have stood a slight chance. In order to beat Tommy Hearns you had to knock him out.

    I know that Floyd Mayweather Jr. is fast, but Hearns had a 78" reach. Picture Antonio Margarito, add 2" in height, make him faster, give him a better jab and overhand right and you're close to the offensive fighter that Hearns was. If Hearns had the chin of Marvin Hagler he would have been the greatest fighter who ever lived.
    Spot on, Mokele - Hearns was truly an awesome fighting machine.
    If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4429
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Welterweight division overall all-time best

    I think PBF would do well, he has all the punches and defense in the book, and like SRL
    he has the ability to adapt to whatever his opponents throw at him (with the exception
    of the castillo fight, which was a fluke bad performance IMO)
    I give Mayweather full credit UD vs Hearns
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,396
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Welterweight division overall all-time best

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep

    I give Mayweather full credit UD vs Hearns
    Go back and watch 147lbs Hearns, Mayweather is made to measure for The Hitman. Lil Floyd lacks the tools to get past that jab, and sooner or later a right hand will find Mayweather's chin.

    He will probably last a lot longer than Cuevas, but in the end, I foresee a similar type of KO for the Motor City Cobra.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    272
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Welterweight division overall all-time best

    Quote Originally Posted by Britkid
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep

    I give Mayweather full credit UD vs Hearns
    Go back and watch 147lbs Hearns, Mayweather is made to measure for The Hitman. Lil Floyd lacks the tools to get past that jab, and sooner or later a right hand will find Mayweather's chin.

    He will probably last a lot longer than Cuevas, but in the end, I foresee a similar type of KO for the Motor City Cobra.
    I agree... Hearns is something else. If only he had a chin! Imagine that.

    Britkid, what do you think of the up and comer Paul Williams. Good speed and power, good boxing skills (still a little raw), 6'1, 147lbs, and a southpaw! 28-0 at the moment, and I think he's top 15 right now. Think he might have the tools to cause some trouble in welterweight a little down the road?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing