No offense dude. But, you really don't know what you're talking about. First of all, you don't even know what the punch stats were for the Taylor/Spinks fight yet you claim that Spinks landed more clean punches. The fight was boring so I could see how you wouldnt really be paying attention. But, that was a really heart felt post you just wrote. As a matter of fact Cory Spinks only landed about 27% of his punches and he did'nt throw a whole lot. Jermain Taylor landed something like 43% of his punches he didnt throw alot either but he was by far the more accurate puncher of the two. Spinks makes it look nice but he really isnt doing anything and if you were really paying attention it was'nt that hard to see. I agree with you on the whole aggressiveness verse finesse school of thought. But, I would say that a combination of both is what makes a truly a good fighter and a truly good fight. Cory Spinks should fight opponents that he is not so afraid of getting hit by. Taylor should fight bigger guys. I watched the fight and I would say Cory Spinks can't beat anyone fighting that way. He can survive that way, but there is a reality television series for survivors. Even comparing Spinks weak effort to Floyd Mayweather's boxing clinic that he put on De La Hoya is an insult to Floyd's accomplishments. Floyd did'nt run, he exhibited great defensive skills and masterful punching accuracy. Floyd clocked De La Hoya and buckled his knees twice. He stood right in front of De La Hoya and beat him to the punch. Cory Spinks was not landing clean punches against Taylor. Floyd Mayweather was landing clean all night. Jermain Taylor did not look great in the Spinks fight, but he clearly won the fight. Anyone who thinks that Floyd Mayweather did'nt clearly and decisevly beat, out box, and out perform De La Hoya is in denial. The same is true for those who think that Spinks deserved the decision over Taylor.