Re: IF MORRALES fought Hamed before Barrera would it be the same?

Originally Posted by
ICE COLD BOXING

Originally Posted by
LegendBoxing65

Originally Posted by
JonesJrMayweather
After watching the barrera-hamed fight again recently..i wonder if EM would have done the same thing to Prince...then after watching raheem and pacquiao beat EM I started to think maybe that would have just been a fight I wouldn't have been able to call..
Also i think it would have to have had to happen before Barrera beat him (the prince) because once Marco beat him it probably would have been easy for morrales, but then erik did beat pacman in the first fight, but i guess that means nothing...
so who would have won if they fought first before Hamed v Barrera? PRINCE or EM?
Somehow Barrera's style would be tougher for Hamed than Morales. Morales was great but he relied more on heart than Barrera. I think Barrera is just a pinch better than Morales. I think Hamed would have beaten Morales.
Disagree Morales was actually better boxer on the outside than Barrera he could box well on outside and if he would of gone in there with Naz he would of known danger of Nazs power and boxed on outside and won decision.
i don't think morrales is better on the outside than barrera..but then i'm only rembering the raheem fight..but this is too hard to tell how it would have gone seeing as how we're all using hindsight to decide...
"Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones
Bookmarks