Quote Originally Posted by MR_TWINKY13
Man this post is dumb thats why they call it -POUND FOR POUND-
which means that boxing EXPERTS who study the sport all came to the conclusion of which boxer is better then other boxer based on skill, speed power etc.. not based on who is bigger.
so if that was the case u r ranking butterbean higher than rafa Marquez because he is bigger an he could probably eat rafas weight in one dinner
Mr Twinky, you are every bit as idiotic as your name suggests.

If you read my posts at all you'd see that I'm arguing for a more accurate reflection of p4p talents not less.

Butterbean is a great example here. As a superheavyweight we don't rank Butterbean at all, he's a side show. Yet a 112 lb fighter with a knockout percentage as high as his would be knocking on the p4p door.

People talk about how great these little tiny guys are but they can't even knock each other out most of the time! Occaisonally you'll get a guy like Ricardo Lopez who can bang and knock his opponents out and he's regarded as a p4p great.

He's only knocking out 105 lb men! p4p a heavyweight hits MUCH harder. A heavyweight fighter lands a solid punch on another heavyweight fighter and it's pretty much game over.

A fly weight lands a solid punch on another fliyweight and it rarely does more than makes them blink.

That right there shows you that P4P heavyweights hit harder. They generate enough power in their 200 + lb body mass to knock out a 200 + lb fighter with one punch.

The vast majority of flyweights cannot generate enough power in their <110 lb frames to even knock another <110 lb man out with one punch.

Fighters like Valero are the exception. A fighter with real power.