
Originally Posted by
josef4334
alright, before you guys go crazy saying this thread was done before hear me out.
everytime we have a debate over pac, a lot of people say that the fighters that he fought are all washed up down the hill or overrated or unknown. why is it that when he fights, a lot of people doubt him. but if he wins people discredit what he does. IMO it dont matter who you fight, washed up old fighters or young up and coming or even prime, if you win in the same fashion and you bring people out of their chair in excitement you should get credit. heck, i think he should get credit for not being booed in a fight. but thats just me and my "bias" assessment.. what do you guys think?
I like Pac, and think he is good for boxing. One of the most exciting fighters out there. He's in the top three p4p, so he gets the credit he deserves. Most fighters get hacked on, for people they didn't look good against, or who they didn't fight, or "he beat that guy when he was old". Hell, every Floyd thread, you bash him into oblivion. Pac is one of the best right now, regardless, and noone can take that away from him.

Bookmarks