Quote Originally Posted by Starr
So you're only evidence is

"Well Barerra beat Hamed and Pacquiao beat Barerra so he is OBVIOUSLY better!!!"


great evidence like I've never heard of the man who beat the man logic before And it's like NEVER been proven wrong Because boxing isnt about style its about who beats who.. its a basic A B and C science!!

And by this logic I can safely say that Mayorga could knock out Mosley in three rounds.. why? because Forrest did it And we saw what Mayorga did to him.. it makes perfect perfect sense!!!
I'm no stranger to sarcasm. You layed it on me pretty thick just like James Spader in "Tommy Boy" LOL!

You're good @ it, I tell you that.

Anyways, Like I said before, Barrera is the common opponent for both.

And style does make difference. But it's not just about style though, the pro-resume makes bigger difference.

If Naz fights Pac and apply the same tactics that he pulled on MAB, he will end up on stretcher on his way to hospital or even in the morgue (god forbid).

Naseem Hamed never really passed any true tests to remember.

He never came out of true gritty wars or showed his resolve like pac has.

Naz fought one elite fighter, got beaten, retired, and now he's someone's cellbitch.

Pac defeated future hall of famers and still kicking butt.

LOL! Pac aint no Mayorga.

Actually Mayorga is more like Naz, being arrogant and cocky that he is.

And where's Mayorga and Hamed now?... I guess they do have something in common.

I think Naz is still in prison with his cell master Tyrone :

http://blog.thesweetscience.com/2006.../#comment-3336

Don't drop the soap in the shower Naz!