some guys never quit yet they never put much into thier careers when they were in thier prime.. That is why guys like McCall or Witherspoon fighting on I do not get. They sort of were flakey. The reason why Hearns fighting on later at least doesn't make me crinch is because he did fight everyone in his career which he felt was important in his prime. I think he put his all into it when he was good, but Witherspoon and McCall did not in thier prime when it matters. . I think that is what fighters have to do. Fight guys who they can fight who can show how good they were in thier prime, not fight on and try to obscure how good they were by trying to win a title at 45 when they couldn't win the title at 35.. . As for fighting who gave there all when they were in thier prime. Hearns did that. Hagler did. We know how good his chin was and his stamina and all that. We learned him.. Delahoya also. Mayweather still we do not know about fully. He still has to be in the big fight where he is tested. Some people will say, maybe he will never be tested but they all are. I never thought Roy Jones would be tested, but he was.Originally Posted by Mar
Bookmarks