Looks like im the only sorry bastard who voted yes  . Ok so he hasn't been that great lately and has probably received more than his fair share of "close" decisions, He's still undefeated. An important thing i picked up while watching byrd and williamson (besides better angry management techniques) is that one of the commentators said that in close rounds, they'll give the beneift of the doubt to the champion (that might not be exactly what they said but i took something away from that fight none the less). Essentially if you are the challenger, you have to bring it on fight night. You have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you are more deserving of the belt than the man who stands before you. Putting on a fight that could go either way, while entertaining, does not solidify you as the better man. If you want to be the champion, you have to win in impressive fashion.