Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by Lyle
Well we can't really figure how he'd attack Wlad or Vitali now because he didn't have to think like that...he was the Wlad Klitschko of his day, the biggest hardest hitting B****** of the bunch!

Foreman would ALWAYS be good he was too effective with his punches and too mean not to be....besides he damn near beat a PRIME Shannon Briggs who's waaaaaay bigger than Wlad now
Foreman got robbed in Briggs fight.
Quoted for truth, Foreman CLEARLY won that fight. Total robbery.
Agreed i had Foreman winning by 2 rounds and you would think that it would be easier for legend like Foreman to win a decision that was clearly his but sometimes you never know in boxing heres little something i found.



New Jersey State Athletic Control Board commissioner Larry Hazzard acknowledged the widespread criticism of the decision in this bout in a 1998 interview, and, referring to his selection of judges, admitted that he "would've done it differently" if he had the opportunity to make the selection again. He explained that he had wanted to give the relatively inexperienced judges Larry Layton and Calvin Claxton "some exposure" by assigning them to work a high-profile fight, but said: "If I had it to do over again, forget it. I'd just wait [to give them exposure]....I guess it was one of those fights most people thought Foreman would win, and a fight most people didn't think would be that difficult to score. And heavyweights are easier to score. This ain't gonna be a big deal. Boy, was it a big deal! Everyone thought Foreman had won. "