Quote Originally Posted by southakron314
Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo
Quote Originally Posted by southakron314
Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo
Quote Originally Posted by Punisher136
I've said it once and i'll say it again. It takes more skill to win a single disciplined match than a mixed one.
This makes no sense whatsover. When two people are competing against each other one on one the difficulty in winning will be on average exactly the same across all sports.

How can it possibly be easier to win in one head to head than another?
It's a mathematical impossibility.

If it was easier for one man to win, then logically it must follow that it's harder for the other man to win.

You're basically trying to make a perfectly balanced see saw rise upwards at one end by placing the identical amount of extra weight on both sides.
How dose it not make sense.
Are you serious? How can be easier for both fighters to win against each other in one sport than it is in another. It's like a see saw. If it's easier for one guy then it's harder for the other guy.
How long dose you average wbc or wbo champ train to become a champ they usually start around 6-11 years old on average. How long has Rich Franklin or George St Perrier trained in MMA. 5 or 6 years and scholastic sports don't count cause those aren't coming out of their pocket.
Mate if it was so easy to win at MMA then trust me a whole shat load of boxers would make the transition and come over just to be able to say they were a world champions in two different combat sports.