Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by undefeated
the 60's ali was the real ali--in the 70's he was only 70% of what he used 2b--and what he used 2b wasnt even prime!
He didn't really have competition in 60s like in 70s so you can't really say that yes he was better but he didn't really have competition in 60s except Patterson and very old Liston.
Liston fought for 6 more years after that fight,Foley had been dodged when he was number 1 contender,until Ali fought him
And ?? he fought for 6 more years and got no where wasn't he like 39 when he fought Ali it was something like that.
Nope he was like 32,and he only had one more loss after the second Ali loss
There is considerable uncertainty about when Liston was actually born. He gave his birth year as 1932. Many believe he was born in 1927, though there is no son named Charles listed with the family in the 1930 census.