Punch stats for Castillio fight say Hatton has chance against Mayweather.

[Kel]

But you said "I'm not sure what these punch stats prove" now you say "I agree punchstats can prove some things"

Do you see?

This is exactly what I meant when I said you're misreading my post.

I said those stats don't prove anything OTHER than the fact that Mayweather is a great defensive fighter and Castillo isn't. The stats do seem to prove that, because stats can show certain things.
But I don't see where the listed stats do anything to support the opinion of the thread starter, that Hatton has a chance against Floyd. How do those posted punchstats do anything to support Hatton's chances against Floyd?

Don't worry about the thread starter we went off topic and I still dont understand your posts.

"I'm not sure what these punch stats prove" now you say "I agree punchstats can prove some things"How is that misreading? Your saying two completely different things.