Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather
Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny
well im pretty sure that the showing we received was of a sub-par Castillo, but there was little he could do against Hatton's style and i believe it was a little early to pronounce him as a shot fighter.
especially since castillo had moved up...but i do think shot or not hatton is bigger and would have beaten any version of castillo...much like clottey would have beaten any version of corralles..simply too big and too active...
Great points...The part that's astounding for me is after one loss to a well conditioned and pressure fighter like Hatton.... Castillo HAD to be shot according to Kellerman, never taking into account other factors that may have affected the fight...did he ever ask Hatton what his strategy in the fight was? or what he saw in Castillo? Nope, just that Castillo was shot and the only possible next fight was against PBF....Kellerman's "interview" was amaturish at best...

Love or hate Larry he always asks "what did you see?" and in this getting the fighters perspective, who gives a S%^t what Kellerman thinks(that's for his ESPN show) I want to hear what the fighters think...