Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather+Mosley
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather+Mosley
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather+Mosley
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather+Mosley
Quote Originally Posted by 7777
Nobody gave Ricky a chance against Kostya, nobody gave Ricky a chance against Castillo.

When he won, both fighters were shot! How old are the current Ring Magazine Champs in each division? 32+ on average at a guess

He is supposed to be one-dimensional, all he can do is hit and hold. 43 times he has got away with doing that

It's a fight I would love to see. Out of anyone left (maybe with the exception of Cotto) I think Hatton has the skills and ferocity to beat Floyd.


if he would have been a man of his word and given collazo the rematch as collazo was the champ..we wouldn't even be talking about PBf v Hatton...because hatton would have "1" in the loss column and floyd would be forced to fight the man he should...Shane Mosley...
Hatton was going to fight someone at 140 and then at 5 weeks notice i think it was he had to change and make 147 it was his first time at that weight and if he would of had rematch he would of beaten Collazo alot more convincing.
i guess that's why he immediately went back down to forty instead of taken a tune up at the new weight...collazo hurt him in that fight several times and he probably doesn't yet feel comfortable enough that he can take the punches from true welters
That would of been a waste of time Collazo had his shot 2 times against Hatton and Mosley and failed Hatton is now going to fight Mayweather so i would say he has made the right choices.
Yeah because he would have a loss had he given the champ collazo a rematch and that loss would have dented any chances of a fight with floyd..so yeah he did the right thing by going backdown to beat up the moving up castillo..because he figured well he got beat up by a bigger man, why not do it to someone else...
How would he have lost ?? that was bad performance from Hatton where as Collazo fought fight of his life big difference.
yeah it was bad because of collazo beating him up....i guess morrales had an off night against raheem too...collazo is slick and would give hatton trouble any day of the week because of the style...if that was a bad night then castillo had a bad night
Hatton wasn't beaten up he won the fight just because he had marks on his face doesn't mean anything he mostly always does Collazo would give Hatton trouble but he wouldn't win Hatton only had 5 weeks and it was his first time at that weight give Hatton the proper time and getting used to Welterweight he would beat Collazo no question.
i dont care about the marks..i have a light complexion and i bruise easily so marks mean nothing..hatton was hurt in that fight.even he said it..and as proud as fighters are you have to be really stunned by a punch to admit it..Hatton was roughed up...it's okay but you have to give collazo his props he fought ricky tough and ricky escaped, not escaped earned a MD..that's simple...to say Hatton is the type of fighter that blows everyone out, and when he doesn't then "it was an off night" that's just wrong because Hatton is one of the best, but not because he soundedly beat his opponents...