
Originally Posted by
ICE COLD BOXING
No he isn't Holmes is he made 20 defences dominated his era Holyfield has been in exciting fights but he never really did dominate his era.
Is it fair to say though that Holmes was 'fortunate' if thats the right word to have fought in a weaker era.
Would he have reigned for so long had he a prime Tyson, Holyfield, Lewis and Bowe to contend with?
There arn't any elite fighter names on his record after all, unless you count Parkinsons ravaged Ali.
I see nobody on Holmes record that Lewis, Tyson and Holyfield wouldn't have beaten just as impressively.
Really who did he beat?
Bookmarks