Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo
Quote Originally Posted by BoomBoom
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo
Quote Originally Posted by BoomBoom
Quote Originally Posted by cockey cockney
depends what you mean really.....best fighter at his peak...or greatest overall in there careers. For example i believe that Tyson is the most talented by miles of the last 20 years....however i accept Holyfield and Lewis achieved more in there careers.
Over all greatest in that time span. Peak has nothing to do with it cause then, yeah Tyson would be higher as would Foreman.
Prime Tyson is not better than prime Foreman

Foreman twice destroyed one of the greatest heavyweights of all time in Joe Frazier plus annihilated Ken Norton.

Tyson never beat anybody on that level and lost every time he faced a true great, unless of course that great wasn't past his prime and coming off a two year layoff following two successive defeats.
Im quite surprised BoomBoom said that because thats nonsense what he said and he is normally good poster.
You read it wrong. What I said was Foreman and Tyson would be higher on the list, not that Tyson would be higher than Foreman cause Foreman rates far higher than Tyson......Ill forgive you though cause you said i was usually a good poster
Sorry BoomBoom my bad I didn't read it properly. Have a
Its all good. I did make this post too confusing. I clicked ya back