Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker
Ok, here is my question to all you people who make these top p4p lists. How can you guys rank guys like Henry Armstrong, Sandy Saddler, Willie Pep, ect ect ect, SO HIGH when you may have seen only 2 or 3 of their fights (or, in many cases, none at all). What is the justification for having these guys so high? Do you rank them based on online and newspaper articles written about them? I don't understand it really...






I think that any man who can hold titles in three weight classes at the same time really needs no building up. Also I think that you look at the competition they beat.

I wasn't alive when Linclon was president but no one has to convince me he was a good one