FFS p4p is a subjective thing and everybody will have their own reasons and permutations of the top 10, and if they can back that up with opinion and a reasoned argument that is all is required, cause it isn't set in stone. Ultimately, what makes the Ring magazine's ratings any more valid than an ardent fan's views? Because it's on a piece of paper?

And why would a poll of boxing fans in the UK necassarily be not valid? We have some of the most knowledgable fans in the world, so I'm down with that.